Unconstitutional federal agencies now arm themselves with weapons that you may not own, and train in tactics that you are prohibited from mastering. Before a government is sure you won't resist, it will make sure you can't resist.

Liz Michael - Tripwire

Web Design by HillTowns Webs
A "Must Read" - Order Your Copy Today ~~~~~~~~
Politically Incorrect T'Shirts - Get Yours Today
For those of you who doubt the government spending and national debt - here are some numbers for you. U. S. National Debt Clock
Remember, Remember the Fifth of November, The Gunpowder Treason and Plot, I know of no reason Why Gunpowder Treason Should ever be forgot. Guy Fawkes, Guy Fawkes, t'was his intent To blow up King and Parliament. Three-score barrels of powder below To prove old England's overthrow; By God's providence he was catch'd With a dark lantern and burning match. Holloa boys, holloa boys, let the bells ring. Holloa boys, holloa boys, God save the King!  A penny loaf to feed the Pope A farthing o' cheese to choke him. A pint of beer to rinse it down. A faggot of sticks to burn him. Burn him in a tub of tar. Burn him like a blazing star. Burn his body from his head. Then we'll say ol' Pope is dead. Hip hip hoorah! Hip hip hoorah hoorah!
May We All Live   IN LIBERTY & FREEDOM mavericklady
Web Design by  Liberty Webs

Obama's Not Exactly's:

  1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe  enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth,  as Selma was in 1965. (Google'Obama Selma' for his full March 4,  2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)

  2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged,  well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

  3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part  of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever  had.

  4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY,  your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting  to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the  first widespread violence in decades. The current government is  pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish  Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Oba ma, is Odinga's  follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak  to Odinga on the phone. Check out the following link for  verification of that....and for more.   Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get  Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections,  his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men,  women and children alive in a Christian church where they took  shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process  here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No  one wants to know the truth. 

  5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she  does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own  interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to  have been one of 14 wives to 1 man. 

  6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic  and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that  language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.  Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be  the first Arab-American President, not the first black President.  Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and  43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side.  While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's  family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only  12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth  certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro).  From....and for more....go to.....http://www.arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_- _Arab-American,_only_6.25%25_African 

  7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily  at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that  faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could  run for office.  4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'"   http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559

  8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were  registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies  for making faces (check your own book).   February 28, 2008.  Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago:  Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to  prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that  seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart  attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the  prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset."  This is just one example  of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative  is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling  facts." 

  9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher  says you could speak the language. 

  10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience  - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and  couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to  study the Koran and watch cartoons. 

  11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for  Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have  never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO  experience with our closest allies. 

  12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY,  you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no  mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your  classmates said you were just fine. 

  13.)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY,  Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It  doesn't, and never did, exist. 

  14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - NOT  EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your  book. It doesn't, and never did, exist. 

  15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here  you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have  enough experience by then, and you are all about having  experience first. 

  16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY,  they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES. 

  17.) Oops, I Misvoted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church  groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your misvote. 

  18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior  lecturer ON LEAVE.  

  19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a  senior lecturer ON LEAVE. 

  20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you  didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it. 

  21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just  14 days from start to finish. 

  22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was  rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all  regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from  which David Axelrod came. 

  23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March,  2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be  released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within. 

  24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY,  you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld  Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your  books. 

  25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111  economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost  99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. 

  26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even  your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part. 

  27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they  were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their  creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for  higher office. 

  28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT  EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of  the conversation your campaign had with them. 

  29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran  Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah  supports the destruction of Israel. 

  30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the  delegates decide. 

  31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer  caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public  vote, and only operate during small windows of time. 

  32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you  passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself. 

  33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used  tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you. 

  34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.  

  35.) I don't Have Lobbysists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47  lobbyists, and counting. 

  36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT  EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one  afternoon. 

  37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't  in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every  single time. 

  38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't  have to buy it. 

  Carol Kalwa  (304) 838-6652  "Qui non intelligit aut discat aut taceat"  Who does not understand should either learn, or be silent

Obama / His Wife / Their Communist Theories

Michelle Obama visits Harrisburg
http://www.charlotte.com/109/story/572303.html
DAVID PERLMUTT
dperlmutt@charlotteobserver.com
HARRISBURG --
This was Michelle Obama's "mom time" in her husband's campaign for president.
She'd come Tuesday to meet with 50 working women who filled a room at a Harrisburg preschool, anxious to talk to Barack Obama's wife.
But they'd have to wait.
Instead, Michelle Obama swept into a classroom of children, ages 2 to 6, to read to them.
She asked for their names, and what they liked most about school. After reading "If You Give a Mouse a Cookie" and "Brown Bear, Brown Bear, What Do You See?" she shouted "potty request!" for one child, and then declared hug time.
The children stormed her in a group hug.
Then it was on to hear concerns of the big people, before heading off to campaign events in Winston-Salem and Raleigh as part of a daylong tour of North Carolina.
It was Obama's first time ever in the state. She said she and her husband would be back many times before the May 6 primary.
"Every state is critical now," she told the Observer. "We want to win North Carolina."
As she's done elsewhere, Obama meets in roundtable discussions with working mothers, because she's a lawyer and mother of two daughters, ages 9 and 6.
"What this allows me to do is make sure that the policies that come out of the campaign, are fueled by people like you," she told her audience.
A panel of five women, each with young children at Dixon Academy, told Obama that the cost of living was taking its toll.
Kim Neely said groceries once cost $40 for a week of meals. Now it's triple that. Rising gas prices made it difficult to get to work. She and her husband work for the same company and worry outsourcing could kill their jobs.
Rebecca Allen, a registered veterinary technician, said her dog gets better health care than her family. "We'd like to have another child, but we have no maternity coverage and it would cost half of what I make in a year," said Allen, whose husband runs a small business.
Obama, like her husband a Harvard-trained lawyer, listened and then spoke off the cuff.
Most Americans, she said, don't want much.
"They don't want the whole pie," she told the women. "There are some who do, but most Americans feel blessed just being able to thrive a little bit. But that is becoming even more out of reach."
After law school, she and Barack were beset by loans they'd still be paying had her husband not written two best-sellers, "The Audacity of Hope" and "Dreams From My Father."
Those debts early in their marriage, she said, equips her husband to better understand the problems many Americans face.
Should she become first lady, she said she'd focus on family issues.
"If we don't wake up as a nation with a new kind of leadership...for how we want this country to work, then we won't get universal health care," she said.
"The truth is, in order to get things like universal health care and a revamped education system, then someone is going to have to give up a piece of their pie so that someone else can have more."

SO - her plan is to take what little I have and give it to someone who works less - has made less effort to learn what I have learned - has less skills then I have but I AM TO SUPPORT THEM AND LOSE WHAT LITTLE I HAVE STRUGGLED FOR THROUGH MY OWN EFFORTS - a totally communist principal. Yup - we need THIS in the White House.

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_each_according_to_his_ability,_to_each_according_to_his_need
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need (or needs) is a slogan popularized by Karl Marx in his 1875 Critique of the Gotha Program. The phrase summarizes the idea that, under a communist system, every person shall produce to the best of one's ability in accordance with one's talent, and each person shall receive the fruits of this production in accordance with one's need, irrespective of what one has produced. In the Marxist view, such an arrangement will be made possible by the abundance of goods and services that a developed communist society will produce; the idea is that there will be enough to satisfy everyone's needs.
The complete paragraph containing Marx's original statement of the creed is as follows:
In a higher phase of communist society, after the enslaving subordination of the individual to the division of labor, and therewith also the antithesis between mental and physical labor, has vanished; after labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want; after the productive forces have also increased with the all-around development of the individual, and all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly -- only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and society inscribe on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!
Although Marx is popularly thought of as the author of the phrase, it has been widely speculated that he merely co-opted a term earlier used by other leaders of the communist movement. The slogan was first used by Louis Blanc in 1840, in "The organization of work", as a revision of a quote by the utopian socialist Henri de Saint Simon, who claimed that each should be rewarded according to how much they work. Despite the secular nature of Marxism, inspiration for this creed may have been drawn from the early Christian communism of the 1600s.
An earlier exposition of this idea, however, is found in the Bible, in Acts of the Apostles. Luke describes the organization of the first Christian congregations following the death of Jesus:
And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. (Acts 2:44-45)
...
Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need. (Acts 4:34-35)
This passage is important to Christian leftists. For further information see Christian communism, Christian socialism, Christian anarchism.
Debates on the phrase
Opponents of Marxism, for example Ayn Rand, have interpreted this statement as saying that people should receive as much as they ask for[citation needed], and they argue that the unproductive will ask for more than they produce, or more than they deserve (see for example "Atlas Shrugged" by Ayn Rand). In response, Marxists usually argue that needs are objective (and refer to such things as food, shelter, education and medical care), and that they are more or less equal between members of the general population. Since communism entails the abolition of private property, it would be impossible for people to hoard things that they do not actually need. In a propertyless society, most objects would be shared; when one person is not using such an object, someone else may pick it up and use it.
However Marxists do accept that some people need more resources than they can produce - for example the elderly or the chronically sick. The principle assumes that such people have a right to these resources, whereas Ayn Rand (for example) specifically asserts that they do not.
Marx delineated the specific conditions under which such a creed would be applicable - a society where technology and social organization had substantially eliminated the need for physical labor in the production of things, where "labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want." Marx explained his belief that, in such a society, each person would be motivated to work for the good of society despite the absence of a social mechanism compelling them to work, because work would have become a pleasurable and creative activity. Marx intended the initial part of his slogan, "from each according to his ability" to suggest not merely that each person should work as hard as they can, but that each person should best develop their particular talents.
As the most prominent ostensible followers of the Marx' theory, the Soviet Union adopted the formula with substantial modification, namely: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his work (labour investment)" suggesting that each participant of this social system must 'earn' the right for sharing the benefits of socialism, rather than just be enabled for their utilization. Marxist-Leninists later codified this as the principle of socialism, with "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" remaining the principle of communism.
Real-world examples
In 'primitive' societies
Marxists, as well as some anthropologists, have asserted that hunter-gatherer societies were characterised by a communal economic system. In Marxism this is called primitive communism.
The family
In general, there is a social expectation that parents should provide for their children - to the point that failing to do so is criminal - and that married adults should share their wealth with one another.
Some left-wingers have therefore suggested that the family is an example of communal economics. For example William Montgomery Brown wrote that
Always, because we were human, we have had to introduce cooperation, or we could not get along at all.
The family is just one instance. The institution of the family could thrive only as it adopted the principles of communism. The need of every member had to be considered, the various members as a rule learned family loyalty, family devotion, and family love. If these expressions are not as strong as they once were, it is not because human nature has changed but because there are so many human affairs nowadays that the family cannot attend to, and they have to be carried on by other organizations. [1]
Others argue that children, who are not ready to independently exercise their rights, "muddies" the example of the family as a communal society. In many societies children leave home when they come of age.
Communes
There have been a number of attempts to practice the principle in small groups, in the midst of societies based on other economic systems. These attempts have not necessarily been directly inspired by Marx or Marxism. For example see:
Diggers
Kibbutz
Anarchist Catalonia
Commune
In some cases the small-scale attempts are intended to be the catalyst for a change in the broader society. Many critics of communal living don't object to voluntary experimentation. It is the forced (government force) commune or forced "sharing" that they object to.
In the mind of the U.S. public
A poll claimed that almost half the population of the United States believe that the U.S. Constitution is the source of Marx's phrase, "so obviously right does the sentiment seem"[1].
More broadly
Most communists and anarchists, as well as some socialists depending on how the term is defined, could be said to believe in a society whose economy would be based around the principle.
In addition there are a number of streams of thought which hold to a similar principle in a limited form. For example Catholic social teaching holds that everyone has the right to a basic standard of living, even if they are unable to earn it by their own efforts. Thus, for example, the able-bodied are bound to subsidize the handicapped. The idea of the welfare state is based on a similar idea, and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights asserts a similar "right to social security" [2].
] References
^ Noam Chomsky, Necessary Illusions, citing FAIR, Press Release, July 19, 1988. Poll on Constitution, Boston Globe Magazine, Sept. 13, 1987, cited by Julius Lobel, in Julius Lobel, ed., A Less than Perfect Union (Monthly Review, 1988, 3).

125 Reasons to Vote For Ron Paul in 2008

Why Does The Establishment Hate Ron Paul?